A public came to consecrate the brick and it did not occur to them whether there was any bad omen in it

More related content:

1. מי שאמר קדושה עם ציבור באופן אקראי שלא התפלל איתם האם כרגע מותר לו להתחיל שמונ"ע עם ציבור אחר אע"פ שלא יספיק לומר עמהם קדושה ומה הדין באופן שמתחילה שמע וענה רק ברוך ולא קדוש לגבי השאלה הראשונה הדין הוא שמותר כמ"ש במשנ"ב סי' קט סק"ד. ולגבי השאלה השניה יש לציין בזה דברי הגמ' בחולין דהמלאכים אין להם רשות לומר ברוך לפני שאומרים קדוש עי"ש, ומבואר מזה דקדוש הוא דבר עיקרי בקדושה, וממילא לכאורה יש לדמותו לחיסר דבר מעיקר ברכה שלא יצא בברכה וה"ה כאן לענייננו לא יצא בקדושה....
2. Is it possible to make Kiddush for a white child on a day when he is afraid that if he does not make a dedication now, his time will pass and he will not have time to make a dedication Apparently not. Sources: Since it is a state, it is the same as it is for delay, as explained for other matters, see BHL Och Techu, 1. And who is the 20th Chazua and the Kahi and the Garhak and more that it is possible to bless a Havdalah candle when there is electricity (see comments and supplements C. Rahetz Ski 3), and there is a Gach din Yaotho, and from Mm to bless on Sunday the candle did not go up on the mind, and it is possible that a candle with [...]...
3. A priest who blesses the blessing of priests and in the middle an alarm of the PKON was heard and the blessing had to be stopped. Is there a bad sign in this כפי שהבאתי לעיל...
4. It rained and extinguished the candles immediately after lighting them. Is there a sign of a curse in this? It seems that there is a sign of a curse in this, and as I extended in the answer to the sanctification of a white child, any mitzvah that was not made possible by something coming from heaven is a sign of a curse, and since here one is already disposed of from the lighting if the weather at the time of the lighting was without wind and rain, from any place even in the sukkah, one will be extinguished when they fell rains, and yet there is a sign of a curse there, and yet he died here [...]...
5. Is it true that there is a preference not to go to the doctors and not to take the children even when necessary, out of faith and security There is a high degree that a person avoids doctors according to the Ramban and the Gara, but it is only for an individual in the generation of Kamash on the 22nd of the Maharsha in the Ketuvoth, and in particular in matters of soul control, God forbid that people in our time follow this leadership, and in the GM they said that The PikoN is not done by minors, etc., but by Gadoi, and the raziz is excellent, and even those with a degree may not be talking about soul control [...]...
6. חברה שחייבה לקוח בתשלום בטעות שלא כדין והחזירו יותר ממה שנטלו האם יש בזה משום ריבית הנה כתב הרמ"א חו"מ סי' רצב ס"ז וז"ל, ואם הרויח במעות, בין היה לו רשות להשתמש בהן או לא, אין צריך לתת מן הריוח לבעל הפקדון. וכתב בסמ"ע ס"ק כא וז"ל, דקדק וכתב אין צריך, הא רוצה ליתן לו הרשות בידו, דכיון דלא בא לידו בתורת הלואה אין כאן משום ריבית, כ"כ במרדכי שם. ועיין […]...
7. Those who consecrated the mother can again consecrate the members of the household בקידוש של שבת בבוקר יכול לקדש שוב ולשתות מן היין, אבל בקידוש של ליל שבת אינו יכול לקדש שוב, אלא אם כן בני ביתו אינם יודעים לקדש לבד. ומי שלא קידש ומקדש לאחרים בלי לאכול, יכול רק אם אינם יודעים, צרויך להיזהר לא לשתות מן היין, ולקדש שוב כדין במקום שיאכל. מקורות: לגבי קידוש לילה […]...
8. One who received Shabbat after the offering portion and wants to sanctify only after the stars come out, is he allowed to sleep in the meantime יש מקום לומר שמכיון שרוצה להדר ולאכול לאחר צאת הכוכבים, ועכ"פ אם הוא רגיל להקפיד על כך, ממילא כרגע אי אפשר לומר שיש עליו חובת סעודה, ולכן גם לפי הצד שאסור לישון כאשר יש עליו חובת סעודה, ממילא בזמן שלא הגיע זמן סעודה שלו וגם לא סמוך לזמן סעודה שלו, לא יהיה מחוייב בזה. וכעי"ז […]...
9. My child found an arrangement on the fence with a sign and brought it home what to do It was forbidden to take it away because anything that is placed in a way that people are used to putting it down has to wait for the person who put it down to come pick it up, but at the moment that the child took it the law is that since there was a mark on the arrangement, it should be announced. And what is being discussed here is not related to a small law that was harmful since it is currently possible for the parents to keep it and declare [...]...
10. If it is assigned that one of the days it was placed on top of another thing and there was no intention of removing it from there, nor would it be placed there until Shabbat, and it did not occur to him at that time that they might have to use the thing under it on Shabbat, is he considered to have placed it knowingly and prohibits the thing above it legally as a basis for the forbidden thing If it is placed on weekdays up to Thursday and Thursday itself at all, it is not considered a basis for the forbidden thing, but if it is placed in this situation on Friday, there is disagreement among the arbitrators, and in fact it should be eased instead of necessary, since there is absolutely nothing that is not intended to sit precisely under the assigned and placed only at random (If the question is spoken in such a way, obviously) the Shinab decided to make it easier [...]...