Here, in the time of danger itself, there is no way for the Gentile to go to prison, as explained in Yod C. Kecht CB regarding the time of war and in the RMA there C. I. and Shekh Skkatt in the name of the Ribash C. Tachd regarding a thief, therefore the wine that was at the time The fire itself is not a concern if it was...!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9739!trpenRead more!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen

Here, in the time of danger itself, there is no way for the Gentile to go to prison, as explained in Yod C. Kecht CB regarding the time of war and in the RMA there C. I. and Sh. The fire itself is not a concern if there was a real danger through people not to linger for nothing in such places.

But if, after the danger had passed, the fire department was still in the house at a time when the Israelite was not allowed to return until the safety of the apartment was ascertained as usual, in this way the wine is prohibited, since the Israeli went out and sailed and the foreigner knows that he sailed, and in this way the foreigner is suspected of drinking as explained in the above-mentioned C. A.

And even if the place is still defined from a security point of view as a dangerous place after a fire, it is not a definition of danger that says that it is not an encampment because the reality proves that the firefighters are not busy and panicked to run away like in wartime or like a thief who is only told that they are not free to encamp, but in a place where, according to reality, the Gentile may linger And to delay without a clear reason is certainly not considered a place of danger for this matter.

!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9740!trpenRead less!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen

As I brought above regarding the matter of kiddush levanah, there is evidence from many places that when a person did not get to fulfill the mitzvah, it is a bad sign, but here we have to discuss it from another side, after all, an erring shatz is a bad sign for those who sent it, and yet there is a place to discuss the matter of this priest lest...!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9739!trpenRead more!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen

As I stated above Regarding the sanctification of an egg Evidence from many places that when a person did not get to keep the mitzvah, it is a bad sign, but here we have to discuss from another side, after all, an erring shatz is a bad sign for his messengers, and yet there is a place to discuss the matter of a priest, whether a shatz is the messenger of the Israelites for blessing and a bad sign It is for the Israelis, indeed it is necessary to divide it a little, Degbi Shatz is not a mitzvah for the Shatzat at all but for the public, Shashka Gabi Cohen is a mitzvah for the priest, and Ika Afi' Damri in Gm' Duani Avrachm Kai on the blessing of the priests themselves, if so For our purposes, there is reason to say that a bad sign is either on the priest or on Israel, and on the other hand, there is reason to say that a bad sign is on one of them and they don't know who it is, and it seems that most of the things are true. The mitzvah, and I'm to the Midd [the blessings of] Dafi' are not torments of love if there is a cancellation of a prayer in them, and yet there is certainly a bad sign here, but the bad sign comes because of the individual and it comes because of the general, and like lamps that are lit because of the individual In the SPG Dasukah 29, and on the other hand, the whole rule that the bow was seen in his days, there is a herd of ma'ala in the inscriptions, and I. in Lent in Drukrat hoi delikta, etc., and I. Maktos 11 ea. The public who are not members of Ma'ala, and this includes both the public and the priests who have the Ma'ala herd to protect the generation and is fenced off in Peretz In.

!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9740!trpenRead less!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen

No. Sources: A woman has no way to wage war, Kiddoshin 2, 2, see Shinoch Targ, and M.M. in a war, a mitzvah goes away, deviates from the Hebrew Bible, and the interpretations, i.e. to have enough water and food, see Radbaz 16 of Kings 14, And the rest...!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9739!trpenRead more!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen

No.

Sources: A woman has no way to wage war, Kiddoshin 2, 2, see Shinoch Targ, and M.M. in a war, a mitzvah goes away, deviates from the Hebrew Bible, and the interpretations, i.e. to have enough water and food, see Radbaz 16 of Kings 14, And I. in the rest of the latter in the key verse there, and in our judgments that in today's army it is known that the participation of women there is to be killed and not to go as the Hazua ruled in Halacha and the other rulers agreed with him, and it is not at all clear that men are exempt from this rule, and a woman who goes to the army should know that she assumes Her entire spiritual future is at stake.

!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9740!trpenRead less!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen

It is explained in the Halacha that when there is trouble one should fumble with actions and repent. Of course, it is not possible for me to know the accounts of Heaven, but if we focus on the sins that are special to our generation and our time, they include the brazen rebellion of the leftists against the Kingdom of Heaven, as well as the damages of the Internet.

It is explained in the Halacha that when there is trouble one should fumble with actions and repent.

Of course, it is not possible for me to know the accounts of Heaven, but if we focus on the sins that are special to our generation and our time, they include the brazen rebellion of the leftists against the Kingdom of Heaven, as well as the damages of the Internet.

!trpsttrp-gettext data-trpgettextoriginal=9740!trpenRead less!trpst/trp-gettext!trpen