The people of Ashkenaz bless the prayer of the way on a horse's way, and the people of Sephard also bless the reward, and the lesson of the horse of the horse is the opinion of the Mishnab and some rulings that it is according to the distance and not according to the time of travel, and the rulings of our time are divided in the matter of travel of our times in terms of several matters, and those who practice according to the Haza'a will say the prayer of the way , and so they will say the reward for the Spaniards, and for further elaboration see the sources.
Sources: In the prayer of the road, the required rate of travel is a horse (Och Ki), and in the blessing of the Gomel, the Ashkenazi people did not use to bar a trip unless it was a trip that was dangerous, and the people of Sephard used to bless every trip because all roads are fraught with danger (Sho'a Rit 7, and also the opinion of some of the first in Tobiah there to bless ACP in the way of a horseshoe like the people of Spain and some even made it worse with less horseshoes).
Regarding travel in our time, there are several questions, 1) Is the persa rate the distance of a persa, which is a distance of 8,000 cubits, or is it necessary to travel at the time rate of a persa walk, i.e. a 72 minute trip.
2) In our time, most journeys do not involve an uninhabited area within a distance of a horse, and the question arises as to what is the law on such journeys.
3) In our time, most trips even outside the city are several hundred passengers at the same time on the same route and road, and there is no danger like in the old days of thieves and bad animals on a normal road, but on the other hand there is a danger of traffic accidents, and the question arises whether it is appropriate to bless because of the danger of traffic accidents.
Regarding the first condemned in the 2012 Ki Skal regarding traveling by train, the meaning is according to the distance and not according to the travel time, and so on. "B" and also brought the letter "MA" in the "RiT" sign.
However, Yaoi' in the OLC [Heb Pid Mev] that he brought 27, and brought evidence from other rulings on the matter of road in the law of Abilot that are estimated according to time, and concluded that the rate of travel is according to an hour and five, and perhaps he decided so because of the SBL, etc. P. Shantak there also [HA 166] Yes to Kola Efi' for the matter of a road before prayer, and perhaps there is a place to say that only with regard to danger the SBL was required since there is a belief that the distance from the city is the cause of the danger, as for the matter of prayer which is the exertion of the body It is more obvious to him that it is according to time and not distance, but in his words in the halakhots of prayer he indicated in his words in the halakhots of the prayer of the way that he relied on this, and it seems that the division that he mentioned there in the Samb was more likely to say that they estimate according to time, as he brought in the name of the rabbi verbs that Kilis Shirif is this Ish.
Regarding the discussion of 2 Yaoi' in the explanation of the halacha [C. Ki 45 and there is no] that he was satisfied with this for the matter of the prayer on the road, and in fact the Geriz did not bless, the Gershza did order, but the Gerzhza blessed because today there is a danger of traffic accidents, and they also brought in his name The Garhak and the Garnak [cit. in the comments and additions there], and in the Or Lezion Council [Hab Yad Mev] it seems that he considered to bless, although in the matter of traffic accidents he did not take that because of this he should be blessed since there was no regulation for that, but instead he took That the main thing in the opinion of the Shu'a regarding the question of the interpretation is that the halacha must be blessed.
In the 20th century (Rit 22) it is explained that the fence of the reward blessing for the people of Spain is your way that obligates the prayer of the way, (and it must be proven from the first ones that were brought in the Bible that the Jerusalemites brought all the ways in possession of danger, and this was brought in the Bible in the matter of the prayer of the way, and it is also proven To get rid of the language of the Aboderahm in the B.C. Rit Shalam Din is to depress the reward of the way prayer), therefore in places where there is the way prayer for the Ashkenazi people, there will also have to be the blessing of the reward for the people of Sephard.
And in the ways that one should add another kola, there is more room to make the blessing of the return than the prayer of the road, even though the blessing of the return is not agreed upon to bless, and there is more room to say Sabal when it is possible to add another side to the exemption, and also that the prayer of the road there are opinions that one can bless permission since it ends with ba. I hear a prayer [P.N. Baruchot according to the Toss there and also added by the Gerish regarding inter-internet travel of our times (I heard from other preachers Rabbi Shimon Cohen ztzel that this was the conclusion of the Gerish), although there are some rulings not to complete a signature on the The poor man, even though the signature there is also in Ai Shume tefilah, due to the specific reason this is not to be trusted].
In Or Lezion [HB Pid Mb] he wrote about the blessing of the reward that the road of our times that sees more cars together is not the road that is in danger, and there was reason to say that regarding the blessing of the reward it was easier and so on, but from the rest of his words it seems that the matter of the prayer of the road and the blessing of the reward Zalz.
Regarding a road that is dangerous in our time and Afi' in less than a horseshoe and Afi' to the Ashkenazi people blesses between the blessing of the road and the reward (see regarding the reward from the 20th century ki skal and Ishi Yisrael PG note 24 in the name of the Garshaza and Or Lezion 11 of Mb ).
מק"ט התשובה הוא: 4014 והקישור הישיר של התשובה הוא: shchiche.com/4014
