In Rama C. X. S. S. I. Dev interprets that it is for the loan or a large gift even just is prohibited, and in the case of a small gift that is not interpreted as being because of the loan it is permissible, but when he knows in his heart that he is giving the gift because of the loan there is a problem with this even with a small gift in the stama, and Ibid. In the Shach SKI Daduka is close to the loan, but not in excess of the loan, then a multiple gift in disguise would be permissible, and he added that if he was not used to giving a gift before then it would also be forbidden in disguise (perhaps Damiri is close to the loan and sla'a in the sources he brought there), And concluded that everything depends on the matter, if it is evident that what he does because of the loan is forbidden in any way, and in the 16th century, the person sentenced for the matter will be satisfied with a small gift when in his heart he does so because of the loan in the dispute of the arbitrators.
מק"ט התשובה הוא: 6651 והקישור הישיר של התשובה הוא: shchiche.com/6651